Greater than 55 former novice rugby union gamers say the game's governing our bodies failed to guard them from everlasting mind harm.
Attorneys representing the group say they've written to World Rugby, the Welsh Rugby Union and Rugby Soccer Union setting out their case earlier than a possible lawsuit.
It follows an analogous transfer involving more than 200 ex-professional players.
World Rugby, the WRU and RFU say they're “progressive” on participant welfare.
This newest declare entails retired feminine internationals and gamers concerned within the males's recreation earlier than it turned skilled in 1995.
Former elite youth gamers and the household of a male participant who was discovered to have continual traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in his autopsy are additionally a part of the group.
CTE is a mind illness which may develop when the mind is subjected to quite a few small blows however it's only detectable after demise.
Legislation agency Rylands Garth says the novice gamers it represents, in addition to wanting monetary compensation to help themselves and their households, hope to “assist make the sport secure for future generations”.
Rylands Garth says the signs its shoppers have suffered embrace continual despair, aggression and violence, important reminiscence loss and habit
They've referred to as on rugby union's governing our bodies to make plenty of speedy modifications.
These embrace: a compulsory restrict on contact in coaching, organising a mind accidents passport, utilizing impartial neuro-experts for analysis and steering and guaranteeing those that have suffered a concussion spend 28 days out earlier than returning to play.
“This can be a life-and-death difficulty for a lot of,” mentioned Richard Boardman, of Rylands Garth, which can be serving to former rugby league and soccer gamers carry comparable mind harm claims.
“It does not matter what degree of the sport you performed or are enjoying at, whether or not it is in school or grownup rugby, and as an expert or novice, male or feminine, we're sadly seeing the identical alarming neurological impairments in any respect ranges of the sport.”
On this newest declare, it's argued rugby union's governing our bodies “negligently failed to guard them from concussive and sub-concussive accidents”.
How have the governing our bodies responded?
World Rugby, the WRU and the RFU issued a joint assertion saying: “Rugby is a sport that gives many lifelong well being and wellbeing advantages for contributors at each degree. It's cherished by thousands and thousands of present and former gamers across the globe.
“We care deeply about each member of the rugby household and have been saddened by the courageous private accounts of former gamers who're battling any well being points. We wish them know that we care, we pay attention, and we by no means stand nonetheless relating to rugby being probably the most progressive sport on participant welfare.
“Appearing on the most recent science, proof and impartial professional steering, we always attempt to safeguard and help all our gamers – future, present, and former. Rugby is a frontrunner within the prevention, administration and identification of head impacts and we proactively fund transformational analysis, embrace innovation and discover know-how that may make the game as accessible, inclusive and secure as attainable for all contributors.
“As we've got not but been served with the small print of the claims in opposition to us, it's not attainable for us to remark additional at the moment.”
If you're affected by any points regarding this story then please go to BBC Action Line for info and help.
